I enjoyed this piece on fur by Albrechsten where she tell how the fur industry in Canada has out-manouvred the guilt trips of the anti-fur lobby by claiming that fur is environmentally friendly.
Kill a mink. Save the planet
A synthetic jumper uses petrochemicals, a fur only kills lovable little animals. Petrochemicals will one day run out. Beavers are inexhaustable!
This has been the subject of alot of jokes in canada (see article).
What I find most humourous are the comments on the article where some morons tout their moral outrage at her choice of attire - janet bought a fur coat on a trip to canada - exhorting her to buy wool instead and stay put in oz to save greenhouse gasses.
Bait, hook, line and sinker.
(explanation of joke for lefty readers, skip if you get it: Can they not see it's their haste to condemn others as environmentally immoral and the blind fur-vour that has created that has left the public wide open to this sort of manipulation?)
Janet proves you can still make money in Australia winding up the left.
Divisive you say? I say that when the other side have warped instincts and cannot be convinced of the truth no matter how hard you try, then dividing and conquering is the best way to isolate them and expose their hypocrisy.
Lefties have created a cynical society where being the biggest smart-arse makes you the most popular. They should not be suprised when they are shat on by those with smarter arses than them.
They will complain, but as right-wingers we understand, that does not mean it's not fair.
